Arsenic might be a factor in H1N1 severity
Arsenic in drinking water is a long-established cause of lung cancer. Until recently, however, there was suspicion, but little or no scientific evidence, that arsenic can promote nonmalignant lung disease. A lab at Dartmouth is helping to rectify the lack of evidence.
Chile: The Dartmouth researchers' interest was piqued by a 2006 study of a Chilean city, Antofagasta, that had a drinking water supply high in arsenic. Investigators in Chile and California compared its death records to those for the rest of Chile and found significantly higher death rates in Antofagasta due not only to lung cancer but also to inflammatory and obstructive bronchial disease.
After reading the 2006 paper, Courtney Kozul, a DMS graduate student in experimental and molecular medicine, collaborated with two DMS immunologists—Richard Enelow, M.D., and Kenneth Ely, Ph.D.—to test the finding.
Kozul conducted the study using three groups of mice. One group got drinking water containing 100 parts per billion (ppb) of arsenic. A second group got water with 10 ppb of arsenic—the current Environmental Protection Agency maximum for arsenic in drinking water—and a control group got water with no arsenic.
All is not well
See a video explaining the dangers of low doses of arsenic in well water.
At the end of five weeks, the lungs from all the mice were removed and analyzed by a process called whole genome transcriptome profiling, in which the RNA products of each mouse's genome—40,000 RNA transcripts—were identified using a microarray. The resulting data was then crunched by a computer to see which RNAs increased with exposure to arsenic and which decreased.
Kozul was struck by the fact that many of the RNAs that decreased are known to be associated with genes that are important regulators of innate immunity. This was a significant finding in and of itself, but Kozul and her colleagues wanted to know more. "We were interested to know if there was a functional consequence of these changes in gene expression," says Kozul. In other words, would the changes affect immunity in a live mouse?
Flu: So the arsenic-exposure part of the experiment was repeated, this time with two groups of mice—one that got 100 ppb and one that got none. This time, at the end of the five-week period the mice were infected with H1N1 flu virus. The researchers then observed how quickly the mice recovered from the flu, using weight gain as a measure. The results were clear-cut. All the mice lost weight as a result of the flu, but the animals in the control group regained it much more quickly than those exposed to arsenic—strongly suggesting that arsenic exposure results in compromised immune function.
Kozul showed that arsenic can affect immunity
Kozul notes that in New Hampshire, municipal water supplies are regularly tested for arsenic, but testing of private wells is up to homeowners. To help homeowners, some of Kozul's colleagues recently produced a video about how to have well water tested.
If you'd like to offer feedback about these articles, we'd welcome getting your comments at DartMed@Dartmouth.edu.
These articles may not be reproduced or reposted without permission. To inquire about permission, contact DartMed@Dartmouth.edu.